As I understand it you should be switching to a thinner riving knife when changing to a thin kerf blade. Unless the saw is under powered I don't see a benefit for a thin kerf blade, but there are negatives like poorer cuts due to vibrations etc. All my table saw blades are 1/8" thick, which makes switching blades very easy.
Trent Davis has a pretty thorough
article on using thin kerf blades with the stock 2.3mm riving knife. A thinner riving knife isn't required with a thin kerf blade.
I have a PCS 1.75HP and the thin kerf blade I used had a kerf width of .093 (the minimum for the 2.3 riving knife) but a body thickness of .062 which was thinner than the tolerances on the riving knife for body thickness (.071-0.83). Trying to compensate for the thinner body, I incorrectly shimmed the left side of the blade .010, pushing the kerf out of alignment with the riving knife. As material was fed past the blade, the riving knife pushed the material to the left, away from the fence. It was easy to discover once I knew what to look for.
I use a stabilizer when making cuts with my thin kerf blade to help with vibration and in most of the material I use -- 12, 15, 18mm Baltic Birch -- I haven't noticed any decrease in cut quality, but someone else's experience might be different. What I have noticed is less resistance when feeding material into the thin kerf blade.
Even if
@Birdhunter is not using a thin kerf blade, the first thing I would check on his saw would be the blade's alignment with the left side of his riving knife. A third JessEm wheel shouldn't be necessary if the saw is properly aligned.