Author Topic: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads  (Read 12270 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Marlow

  • Posts: 106
Wondering if anyone has had any experience using the SCM/Minimax Xylent spiral cutter block on a jointer/planer?  Not much info available on the web. Ideally, I'd like to see direct comparison of this head to the Felder and/or Byrd.

Festool USA does not pre-approve the contents of this website nor endorse the application or use of any Festool product in any way other than in the manner described in the Festool Instruction Manual. To reduce the risk of serious injury and/or damage to your Festool product, always read, understand and follow all warnings and instructions in your Festool product's Instruction Manual. Although Festool strives for accuracy in the website material, the website may contain inaccuracies. Festool makes no representations about the accuracy, reliability, completeness or timeliness of the material on this website or about the results to be obtained from using the website. Festool and its affiliates cannot be responsible for improper postings or your reliance on the website's material. Your use of any material contained on this website is entirely at your own risk. The content contained on this site is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice.


Offline Timtool

  • Retailer
  • *
  • Posts: 1011
    • My website
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2017, 11:15 AM »
I have the Felder and when I look at the SCM I have the impression that it's a "fake" spiral block. The individual knives appear to be practically parallel to the block, instead of following the spiral curve like the Felder does. So you wouldn't have the "shearing" effect that makes spiral blocks interesting.

Perhaps this can be confirmed by the fact that it uses (or not) special curved cutters like the Felder, and not standard square cutters.

You would still have the advantage of spreading out the cuts, but it would still hack the wood and not shear it. But then it has 3 rows and a more aggressive spiral shape, so perhaps that makes up for it.
It's all assumptions based on the pics though!
BR10, MFK 700, OS 400, ETS EC 150/3, KA 65-plus,TS55R, CT22E, CTLmini, CTL MIDI, CTM 36 AC HD, Kapex KS120, ETS125, ETS150/5, RO150, RO90, CXS-set, T-15+3 set, DTS400, OF900, OF1010, OF2200 set, Carvex PS420 EBQ set, EHL 65, SSU 200, Centrotec installer set, LR32-sys, FS-800, FS-LR-1400x2, domino 500+domino sys, domino 700 XL, Surfix-sys, Sys-box 1, Syslite, LEV-350, Sys-box,MFTB/1-2-4... MFTC, MFSC

Offline Marlow

  • Posts: 106
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2017, 02:29 PM »
Interesting observations, but of course the proof of performance will be in the pudding, i.e., the quality of cut judged by those that have actually used these.  The SCM xylent head has been available in Europe, but I get the impression that its not in wide use (yet) here in the US.

Offline Bert Vanderveen

  • Posts: 891
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2017, 08:51 AM »
Some solid information on after market helical cutterheads:

https://www.canadianwoodworking.com/tools/introduction-helical-cutter-heads

(May be dated…)
Cheers, Bert Vanderveen

TS55 · TS55R · OF1010 · DF500 · MFT/3 + TSB1-MW 1000 + VL + CMS TS55 + CMS PS300 + LA-CS 70/CMS · CTL Midi · RTS400 · 2 x CXS Li 1,5 · T15+3 Li 4,2 · TI15 Impact Li 4,2 · Centrotec Sets 2008 + 2015 · PSB300 · LR32-SYS · RO150 · KS120 · 2 x MFK700 · RO90 · OFK700 · BS75 · OFK500 · OF2200 · CMS-GE · Vecturo 18 Li · TID 18 · TKS 80 EBS-Set · DTS 400 · ETS EC 125 w 150 pad · Surfix Set · CTL SYS · CT-VA-20 · … | Mirka 1230L P&C | Hammer: A3 31 Silent Power · N4400 · HS950 | TaigaTools: VacPods Pro Set
On order: … [ ! ]

Offline Marlow

  • Posts: 106
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2017, 10:24 AM »
Good article: too bad they left out the Felder head (and the article does pre-date the availability of the SCM Xylent head). 

Offline J0hn

  • Posts: 116
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2017, 02:14 PM »
I have the Felder and when I look at the SCM I have the impression that it's a "fake" spiral block. The individual knives appear to be practically parallel to the block, instead of following the spiral curve like the Felder does. So you wouldn't have the "shearing" effect that makes spiral blocks interesting.

Not sure what you mean by 'fake spiral block'?  They look almost identical to me, what am I missing?

Felder


SCM


Offline RobBob

  • Posts: 1376
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2017, 02:34 PM »
@J0hn

For one thing, judging by the pictures you posted, the SCM cutters look like they are square to the board while the Felder cutters are set at an angle, giving a shearing cut.  The shearing cut gives less tear out, little to no scalloping and a smoother finish, almost like a card scraper.

« Last Edit: October 25, 2017, 03:05 PM by RobBob »

Offline Bert Vanderveen

  • Posts: 891
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2017, 02:57 PM »
I tried to find some info regarding patents and my impression is that cutterheads with an axial placement are covered in this patent:
http://www.google.ac/patents/US5083887
… and manufacturers either have to license it or work around it by placing the cutters parallel to the 'face'.

I may be completely wrong (probably am).
Cheers, Bert Vanderveen

TS55 · TS55R · OF1010 · DF500 · MFT/3 + TSB1-MW 1000 + VL + CMS TS55 + CMS PS300 + LA-CS 70/CMS · CTL Midi · RTS400 · 2 x CXS Li 1,5 · T15+3 Li 4,2 · TI15 Impact Li 4,2 · Centrotec Sets 2008 + 2015 · PSB300 · LR32-SYS · RO150 · KS120 · 2 x MFK700 · RO90 · OFK700 · BS75 · OFK500 · OF2200 · CMS-GE · Vecturo 18 Li · TID 18 · TKS 80 EBS-Set · DTS 400 · ETS EC 125 w 150 pad · Surfix Set · CTL SYS · CT-VA-20 · … | Mirka 1230L P&C | Hammer: A3 31 Silent Power · N4400 · HS950 | TaigaTools: VacPods Pro Set
On order: … [ ! ]

Offline Timtool

  • Retailer
  • *
  • Posts: 1011
    • My website
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2017, 02:58 PM »

Not sure what you mean by 'fake spiral block'?  They look almost identical to me, what am I missing?

As Rob mentioned, on the Felder you can clearly see that the cutters are placed at an angle, while on the SCM they look almost parallel to the block.
They don't look perfectly parallel but the angle is clearly lesser than the Felder, the close up also shows that the cutters appear rounded like on the Felder. Those cutters are expensive, I would certainly try to find out how much there are on the block and how much they cost.
BR10, MFK 700, OS 400, ETS EC 150/3, KA 65-plus,TS55R, CT22E, CTLmini, CTL MIDI, CTM 36 AC HD, Kapex KS120, ETS125, ETS150/5, RO150, RO90, CXS-set, T-15+3 set, DTS400, OF900, OF1010, OF2200 set, Carvex PS420 EBQ set, EHL 65, SSU 200, Centrotec installer set, LR32-sys, FS-800, FS-LR-1400x2, domino 500+domino sys, domino 700 XL, Surfix-sys, Sys-box 1, Syslite, LEV-350, Sys-box,MFTB/1-2-4... MFTC, MFSC

Offline J0hn

  • Posts: 116
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2017, 03:46 PM »
OK - I see what you guys are saying now, thanks for 'schooling' me  :)

Offline TheSergeant

  • Posts: 103
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2017, 04:19 PM »
Also note the carbide inserts on the Bryd heads are curved slightly, almost like how you camber the edges on a hand plane blade.  My suspicion is that this reduces 'track marks' left on the surface.  I have a Shelix head on for my Dewalt 735 but haven't installed it yet.  I just picked up a new old stock 1991 Delta DC-33 13" planer and want to run that through it's paces before I commit to the 735.  I'm kind of hoping I prefer the 735 just because a Shelix head on the Delta is more than 2x the cost of the 735 at ~$900. 

If it were me I'd take a closer look at the Bryd heads. 

Offline Michael Kellough

  • Posts: 6218
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2017, 04:33 PM »
I'd like to see/hear a comparison of the Silent and Xilent cutter heads, and the Byrd Shelix.

Offline Marlow

  • Posts: 106
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2017, 04:40 PM »
Michael: So would I, which is why I posted this inquiry.  It would appear that there are not many users of the Xylent (or I've also seen it as Xilent) cutter head yet in the US.  It would be nice to see some positive press on this: all that I've been able to find are reports of how quiet it is: that is nice, but it has to plane beautifully as well.  Marlow

Offline Michael Kellough

  • Posts: 6218
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #13 on: October 25, 2017, 05:13 PM »
Michael: So would I, which is why I posted this inquiry.  It would appear that there are not many users of the Xylent (or I've also seen it as Xilent) cutter head yet in the US.  It would be nice to see some positive press on this: all that I've been able to find are reports of how quiet it is: that is nice, but it has to plane beautifully as well.  Marlow

Literally, as in the photo above.

Offline Marlow

  • Posts: 106
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #14 on: October 25, 2017, 05:32 PM »
Exactly.  Xilent/Xylent.  Maybe its a translation thing, but I've seen it in SCM documentation both ways???

Offline Steven Owen

  • Posts: 443
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #15 on: October 26, 2017, 12:59 AM »
The helical blade look promising.  The Dewalt 735 sells for $699 in Canada including the shelves.  The Byrd cost $500 per a cutting head.  You need two of them.  The irony is you’ll spend more on the helical cutters than you ever did in the machine.

It’s kind of like buying an ink jet printer.  The parts cost more than the machine.

The biggest mistake people make is not buying the OEM Byrd cutting heads.  The non OEM sized throws the DW 735 depth out by 1/16 making the machine work harder with more passes which results in a small amount of snipe. 

The OEM blades give a much cleaner cut on the DW 735.
Festool CT Midi, Festool ETS 125, DF 700 Domino Coming Soon

Offline AtlantaWood

  • Posts: 1
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #16 on: July 20, 2018, 02:19 PM »
I believe both cutterheads are very similar and perform well. Regardless, the advantages of the helical cutterhead are noise reduction, carbide material, possibility to replace individual damaged knives, and greatly reduced tear-outs with a much smoother finish on difficult wood. The true comparison to be made would be to plane similar boards in both machines and identify the small differences in finishing and chips if any.

The SCM Xylent cutterhead knives are set at an angle and not parallel with the blade. Without a direct picture of the cutterhead it is hard to judge which cutterhead has more or less of an angle. I would imagine the optimal knife degree/angle would be dependent on the curvature of the spiral around the cutterhead and number of knives. The SCM Xylent cutterhead appears to spiral around the cutterhead more and have less knive overlap.

The 410mm (16") Xylent cutterhead has 66 knives total.
The 520mm (20") Xylent cutterhead has 84 knives total.
The 630mm (24") Xylent cutterhead has 105 knives total.

Videos of these cutterheads
SCM Xylent Cutterhead Video where several knives are removed.
https://youtu.be/jk6rSzC9n5Q?t=339

Below are the noise comparisons between the Machines
SCM Xylent Cutterhead DB Noise Comparison (88db standard to 75db with Xylent Cutterhead)
https://youtu.be/yTpQkpbuKXM?t=55

Felder Noise Comparison (90db Standard to 80db with Silent cutterhead)
https://youtu.be/JZxY76Y92CQ?t=109

Offline Marlow

  • Posts: 106
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #17 on: July 23, 2018, 02:23 PM »
Since this old post has re-surfaced, I will take the opportunity to sing the praises of the SCM Minimax Xylent Cutterblock. I've been using if for a few weeks now and it provides superb results: as good or better than the Byrd head, which I thought was fantastic. 

Offline Kwai

  • Posts: 5
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #18 on: January 14, 2019, 03:46 PM »
Since this old post has re-surfaced, I will take the opportunity to sing the praises of the SCM Minimax Xylent Cutterblock. I've been using if for a few weeks now and it provides superb results: as good or better than the Byrd head, which I thought was fantastic.

Hi Marlow,

First post on the FOG!

I've got a SCM FS41 Elite with a standard cutterblock and was thinking of upgrading to a spiral block. I have a choice of either retrofitting the SCM Xylent cutterblock (kit available from SCM $$$!) or the Byrd Shelix cutterblock.
My main reason for wanting to swap is NOISE. Of course I'll appreciate the other benefits as well ;)
From your experience, which cutterblock would give the best noise reduction?

Any other observed performance differences between the two cutterblocks would be appreciated as well.

Thanks!
Kwai

Offline Cheese

  • Posts: 10763
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #19 on: January 14, 2019, 04:22 PM »
FWIW...I put a Byrd Shelix on a Dewalt 735 and it reduced the noise level by 10-12 dB.  [cool]

Offline Kwai

  • Posts: 5
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #20 on: January 14, 2019, 07:54 PM »
FWIW...I put a Byrd Shelix on a Dewalt 735 and it reduced the noise level by 10-12 dB.  [cool]

Hi Cheese.
Wow, a 10-12dB real-world reduction is very impressive for the Shelix!
The SCM Xylent company video is claiming 13dB for their spiral block... pretty close (if you can fully believe promo material).

I noticed that the Shelix 16" cutterblock has 8 wings of knives with a total of 128 knives.
The Xylent 16"/410mm has only 66 knives as mentioned earlier by AtlantaWood.
Not sure what having twice/half as many knives means performance-wise, but that's a big difference in block design.

Cheers, Kwai

Offline online421

  • Posts: 150
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #21 on: January 14, 2019, 09:26 PM »
FWIW...I put a Byrd Shelix on a Dewalt 735 and it reduced the noise level by 10-12 dB.  [cool]

Hi Cheese.
Wow, a 10-12dB real-world reduction is very impressive for the Shelix!
The SCM Xylent company video is claiming 13dB for their spiral block... pretty close (if you can fully believe promo material).

I noticed that the Shelix 16" cutterblock has 8 wings of knives with a total of 128 knives.
The Xylent 16"/410mm has only 66 knives as mentioned earlier by AtlantaWood.
Not sure what having twice/half as many knives means performance-wise, but that's a big difference in block design.

Cheers, Kwai

for 410mm wide, Felder has 63 knives. almost same number of knives but Felder only has 2 rows, where SCM is 3 rows.

before I purchased my AD951 I asked my Felder agent and was told it is not the more knives the better.

Kwai, coming back to your question, if I were in your position, I will get the Xylent cutter block, yes it is more costly but spreading out 10-15 years, the differences is minimum, It is almost like you drive a Porsche and you want to swap out an engine, do you put in a better Porsche engine or an aftermarket engine? I know what I will do...
SCM L'Invincibile si X
SCM SD30
SCM TI145EP
Felder AD951
Masterwood OMB1V
Omga T55-300
Comatic DC40
Chicago Pneumatics CPRS10500
Ceccato CDX 12
Nederman S750

Offline Cheese

  • Posts: 10763
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #22 on: January 14, 2019, 09:34 PM »
Hi Cheese.
Wow, a 10-12dB real-world reduction is very impressive for the Shelix!
The SCM Xylent company video is claiming 13dB for their spiral block... pretty close (if you can fully believe promo material).

I noticed that the Shelix 16" cutterblock has 8 wings of knives with a total of 128 knives.
The Xylent 16"/410mm has only 66 knives as mentioned earlier by AtlantaWood.
Not sure what having twice/half as many knives means performance-wise, but that's a big difference in block design.

[welcome] to the FOG Kwai.

I performed a before and after test using a 5 buck app on an iPhone so I wouldn’t necessarily call it using scientific method. But there is a very discernable difference in sound pressure levels between the different planer options. So from my experience I’d say that the 13 dB claim from SCM is probably very realistic.

There’s just no way I’d go back to straight blades. I also have a Delta jointer and will add a Shelix/multiple carbide inserts head to that machine.

Offline Kwai

  • Posts: 5
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #23 on: January 15, 2019, 01:08 AM »
for 410mm wide, Felder has 63 knives. almost same number of knives but Felder only has 2 rows, where SCM is 3 rows.

before I purchased my AD951 I asked my Felder agent and was told it is not the more knives the better.

Kwai, coming back to your question, if I were in your position, I will get the Xylent cutter block, yes it is more costly but spreading out 10-15 years, the differences is minimum, It is almost like you drive a Porsche and you want to swap out an engine, do you put in a better Porsche engine or an aftermarket engine? I know what I will do...

Thanks for the information and advice online421.
Your AD951 looks awesome, what a beast!

The 128 knives on the 16" Shelix does sound like a lot, I'd imagine that they might generate additional resistance when pushing a board over the planer with 8 wings of cutters. I wonder if that's why Felder went with just 2 rows of spirals?

Have you seen any direct comparisons between the Felder Silent-Power two-spiral and the SCM Xylent three-spiral cutterblocks?
The SCM rep has told me that the Xylent does require more power than their straight cutterblocks for the same depth of cut. Felder seems to have addressed the cutting efficiency with their Silent-Power...

I tend to agree with you about sticking with the Xylent. Good advice for the long run.

Cheers!



Offline Kwai

  • Posts: 5
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #24 on: January 15, 2019, 01:11 AM »


[welcome] to the FOG Kwai.


Thanks for the warm welcome Cheese! Looking forward to learning and sharing :)

Offline Cheese

  • Posts: 10763
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #25 on: January 15, 2019, 01:47 AM »
Thanks for the warm welcome Cheese! Looking forward to learning and sharing :)

At 70 something...so am I.  [big grin]

Offline online421

  • Posts: 150
Re: Felder Silent vs. SCM/Minimax Xylent vs. Byrd Cutterblocks/Heads
« Reply #26 on: January 15, 2019, 06:05 PM »
for 410mm wide, Felder has 63 knives. almost same number of knives but Felder only has 2 rows, where SCM is 3 rows.

before I purchased my AD951 I asked my Felder agent and was told it is not the more knives the better.

Kwai, coming back to your question, if I were in your position, I will get the Xylent cutter block, yes it is more costly but spreading out 10-15 years, the differences is minimum, It is almost like you drive a Porsche and you want to swap out an engine, do you put in a better Porsche engine or an aftermarket engine? I know what I will do...

Thanks for the information and advice online421.
Your AD951 looks awesome, what a beast!

The 128 knives on the 16" Shelix does sound like a lot, I'd imagine that they might generate additional resistance when pushing a board over the planer with 8 wings of cutters. I wonder if that's why Felder went with just 2 rows of spirals?

Have you seen any direct comparisons between the Felder Silent-Power two-spiral and the SCM Xylent three-spiral cutterblocks?
The SCM rep has told me that the Xylent does require more power than their straight cutterblocks for the same depth of cut. Felder seems to have addressed the cutting efficiency with their Silent-Power...

I tend to agree with you about sticking with the Xylent. Good advice for the long run.

Cheers!

My Felder agent told me that as well, 3 rows of knife will generate more resistance. and maybe thats why Felder went with 2 rows? in the old days planer/jointer only had 2 straight knives anyway.

I havnt had any comparison between SCM Xylent and Felder's Silent power.  When I was in the market for a 510mm wide JP combo with spiral head I wanted a SCM, at least a Nova or a FS7.  But the closest machine to me at the time was in Italy.  It would take at least 3-4 months to get them here in NZ.

Compare to Felder, the NZ agent is 2.5km ( about 1.5mile) from where I live, they have 2 x AD951 with Silent power, the agent gave me a good deal (they knew I am a SCM man and have a couple of SCM machines in my workshop already), and I reluctantly purchased the AD951.

To date the Felder has been great, only regret is that I should have bought them earlier.

SCM L'Invincibile si X
SCM SD30
SCM TI145EP
Felder AD951
Masterwood OMB1V
Omga T55-300
Comatic DC40
Chicago Pneumatics CPRS10500
Ceccato CDX 12
Nederman S750