...
I think you take it too seriously.
When I say what is the -intent/goal/objective- it does
not necessarily mean they have achieved it. Nor that I condone it universally. I do
when it results in a product I like, of course.
Sometimes they add a feature which does not see much use, and the tool ends up good in a very narrow niche while being overpriced for the common use case.
Sometimes they hit jackpot and introduce a feature which transforms the market. Hit/Miss basically.
From what I observe, this is their business model the last two decades or so. They have some "filler" tools, but even there they always try to put in some capability or feature that can justify the premium prices they want to charge.
I do not want a turf war here, so will try to articulate on one point - the SDS drills - where Hilti is the top dog bare none so is a good example.
Same the Hilti SDS stuff and the installers handy mini-SDS Festool makes. Both make hammer drills, but for a completely different purpose so do not really compete with each other.
An SDS is used to drill holes and fix stuff to walls. So is a hammer drill. Could you explain exactly what you mean by 'a completely different purpose?'
BHC purpose:
Making smallish - usually 4-6 mm, at times 8mm - holes into concrete for installing cabinets etc.
Key features: Small, Light, suspended handle /not common in this class/
Limitation: low power (adequate for the purpose but nothing more)
There is only ONE semi-equivalent Hilti tool - TE 2-A22 - all other Hilti hammers are way bigger class and in no way compare to the BHC.
Well, these are still not comparable. The Hilti is heavier, weaker, way longer (matters for small/short bits) and has no suspension.
The Hilti is a tool for the construction worker or installer who makes 100s of holes a day.
The Festool is a tool for the cabinet installer who makes 10 holes a day, usually less. It can probably survive the construction crew handling. But it is not meant for that. Hilti is meant for that use and does an excellent job there while for the installer it would seem "rough" compare to the BHC.
I have a bigger Bosch 3J hammer. And I still bought the BHC because most of the time I do not need a powerful and HEAVY hammer but I still need something stronger than a percussion.
EDIT: Checked for fun, and the TE2-A22 is actually more expensive than the BHC over here. That is fine with me. Mechanically I would expect it to be a stronger, more survivable tool.
One note, you specifically not correct is the the Hilti AG125. The Protool/Festool AG 125 has dust collection accessories.
No it doesn't. If it did, I'd have seriously considered it, as I would really love to have gone cordless.
I have and use all three accessories for the AG 125 with my AGC 18 using a shim (reference below). They are kinda overpriced, but they do work well. Unfortunately they are kinda hard to get as these are a carry-over from the Protool times and apparently do not sell that well.
I have no Hilti attachment to compare in practice so can only state that there is almost no micro-dust when using either the DCC-AG or DCG-AG. The DCG-AG FH is the odd one and id kinda compromise so dust collection there is not optimal but still works OK for where the DCG-AG cannot be used.
https://www.rubart.de/index.php?product=10027688https://www.rubart.de/index.php?product=10035942https://www.rubart.de/index.php?product=10027673